Wait, so you're saying that despite the fact that:
- We have accurate measurements of ocean Ph and CO2 concentrations for the past 50 years
- We have a clear understanding of the emissions of CO2 from manmade sources and a record that goes back since the beginning of the industrial age
- We understand the effects of acidification on a large variety of ocean species
- We see a trend of ocean absorbtion of CO2 absolutely consistent with out knowledge of atmospheric chemistry
That means that it's BS?
If you had some evidence to back up the fact as to why a set of multiple thousands of studies in oceanography are flawed when they point out to a singular trend, with a margin of confidence greater than most of the so-called scientific facts that are out there, I wouldn't think what you write is plain denialism.
That means that it's BS?
If you had some evidence to back up the fact as to why a set of multiple thousands of studies in oceanography are flawed when they point out to a singular trend, with a margin of confidence greater than most of the so-called scientific facts that are out there, I wouldn't think what you write is plain denialism.