Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Bosses wouldn't be able to threaten to fire someone if they continue showing up to work late."

The employer is paying the employee to provide a service according to rules that both parties agreed to when the employee was hired. Insisting that they show up on time isn't coercing the employee, since it's something they freely agreed to as a condition of their employment.

"Restaurant patrons couldn't threaten to leave a (only one) negative review if their service is poor."

The restaurant patron is paying to be served, so they wouldn't be getting something they're not already entitled to by threatening to leave a bad review.

"but it would be illegal for me to request money from my neighbor and promise to tell his wife about his affair if he declines."

The difference here is that you're trying to force your neighbor to give you something you're not entitled to (his money) by threatening to do something bad to him. It's different from the boss or restaurant patron, who are demanding services that they've paid for.



Yes, I'm well aware of your descriptions, which is precisely my point. The description of extortion given above would include the first two things.


I think that's not true, due to the presence of the word "unlawfully". An employer or restaurant patron receiving the services that they paid for is not unlawful. However, taking money from your neighbor that he doesn't want to give you is unlawful.


But that part is circular. I want to know if a given act is unlawful.


Maybe he's the one who's having an affair with his neighbor's wife, and he paid her for it, but wasn't satisfied?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: