Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Heres an analogy that most hackers can identify with-- the local coffee shop. The agreement there is implicit as well (and sometimes explicit): buy this coffee, and you can use the internet. Should you get free internet without buying the coffee?


Except coffee shops are for-profit. I'm not concerned Wikipedia will disappear. I am concerned that the NY Times online will disappear, because it needs to sustain a profit.

(For the record, I actually worry if my coffee purchase really does offset my resource usage when I stay for 3-4 hours in my local coffee shop on weekends.)


Except coffee shops are for-profit.

Theoretically speaking. See:

http://www.slate.com/id/2132576/?dupe=with_honor +

"I opened a charming neighborhood coffee shop. Then it destroyed my life."

+ No clue what that query parameter is doing there, but I got to it with Google.


Yes, I've read that. And it supports my point: the coffee-shop wasn't able to make a profit, and it went out of business.


WiFi or no WiFi, beverage or no beverage, a coffee house lets you hang out until the manager decides to throw you out. Likewise, NYTimes.com can revamp its site such that nonsubscribers are limited to 1 hour at the site with 24 hours in between, like HN's noprocrast.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: