It's a shame they didn't test CouchBase 2.0 (or at least 1.8)... and really kind... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		nirvana on Nov 3, 2012 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: NoSQL databases benchmark: Cassandra, HBase, Mongo... It's a shame they didn't test CouchBase 2.0 (or at least 1.8)... and really kinda silly, given that it is pretty widely used commercially. I think CouchBase may be the most successful NoSQL database, when it comes to commercial installations (for large customers, maybe mongodb has more total customers.) Plus, I think it would have scored very well here.

ericcholis on Nov 3, 2012 [–]

I was curious about CouchBase myself. I know it's hard to run tests on every variation of the NoSQL fad, but CouchBase (IMHO) is a pretty sizable player.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact