Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Do you have to prove that your 3D printer cannot print a 3D printer which can print a gun?


This reminds me of Ken Thompson’s speech on trusting trust. The recursive/meta nature of it all has helped me explain to those unfamiliar that this is such a waste of time. Education is where it’s at, but I’m preaching to the choir here on HN.



Not OP but yeah that's the one!


when offspring are forbidden, only outlaws will have in-laws


only when they start printing ICs


Trying to restrict the non-printed ICs you'd connect to your 3D printed parts would be even dumber. There's a zillion things that can slam out bits and control a stepper motor.


you can build a 3d printer out of general-purpose electronic bits, anything they tried to ban would send ripples into countless other industries that are completely unrelated to each other or 3d printing.

By "general-purpose" I mean that there's no components that are 3d-printer specific; motor controllers and microcontrollers and voltage regulators and all the various jellybean parts. And even if there were any, they could easily be replaced with general-purpose components.


Well, you can print out of conductive materials.


Like the printers that won't do prints of money that's money-size




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: