Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> "Hejlsberg: First of all, C# is not a Java clone. ... we looked at lots of languages, we looked at Java"

- https://web.archive.org/web/20100109195800/http://windowsdev...

You can just state the author of the language is lying and you somehow know better. You don't even justify why "they don't want to acknoweldge it" - even with Hejlsberg there acknowledging taking ideas from Java - or explain why C# had those differences mentioned in the rest of that interview, or why Microsoft separately wrote their own Java implementation like Visual J++ if C# was just "their Java".





Completely agree, HN is mostly anti .NET/C#. It rarely gains attraction, and when it does, people bashes it with unfounded or very outdated info from another era.

Wrong! J# was Microsoft’s Java.

"Visual J++ is Microsoft's discontinued implementation of Java" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_J%2B%2B

"J# does not compile Java-language source code to Java bytecode .. does not support Java applet development or the ability to host applets directly in a web browser" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_J_Sharp




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: