As a reason not to IPv6? I guess. As a thing, not scare-quoted, but really secur... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		tptacek 28 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: IPv6 is not insecure because it lacks a NAT As a reason not to IPv6? I guess. As a thing, not scare-quoted, but really security? No. Be careful with things like "absolutely no idea what they're talking about".

cyberax 28 days ago | [–]

I don't think that the inherent security of NATs is a _good_ reason to not do IPv6.

But it _is_ a reason, and it _is_ true.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact