The idea that you can't both use AI heavily and use thinking, make choices, and use experience is the part I think I disagree with. People sometimes use AI to make thoughtless slop, that doesn't mean everyone does.
I think we're going to come into contact with brilliant projects that people have spent years making and there would just be no way they could've done them without AI. It will be a human thinking it through making thousands of choices just like the OP said about Jurassic Park. You can and basically have to guide the AI like crazy to get any output worthwhile.
Exactly this. In the early days of image generation I once spent about 9 hours carefully remastering a generated image until I was happy with the result.
Are those hours completely without value, because I used genAI during most of them? It involved a LOT of consideration and a few pretty tough choices. But because I didn't do my 10.000 hours, and it's sad for those that did, I'm not allowed to create this way?
Whatever, I'm still putting it on my wall. It means more to me than most "legit" art does.
I think we're going to come into contact with brilliant projects that people have spent years making and there would just be no way they could've done them without AI. It will be a human thinking it through making thousands of choices just like the OP said about Jurassic Park. You can and basically have to guide the AI like crazy to get any output worthwhile.