>However, I looked through all the posts you just linked. I still have nothing quantitative on whether "PWAs never took off". It's so much analysis on Apple.
"Nothing quantitative"? You either dont know what that word means or you're unable to grasp what you're reading. I've explained in great detail why PWAs couldn't live up to their potential. The reason why there is "so much analysis on Apple" is because they, as a dominant gatekeeper, have actively engaged in sabotage of PWAs in defense of their App Store by treating PWAs as an existential threat. (See? You're making me repeat myself again, because you either refuse to reflect on what you're actually reading or you are simply not able to connect the dots and realize that i've already answered your question)
>> That's just the lazy manufactured and false narrative that I've already thoroughly debunked. I'm not going to repeat it, since you would just ignore it again.
>This is how you replied to me. You say "ignore it again" but this is the first time we spoke and all I can see is up-thread. That's what I mean by prejudice.
I said that "you would ignore it again" (which you have just done btw) precisely because that's not the "first time we spoke", your comment was in response to my comment and that comment of mine already explained that Apple sabotaged PWAs. You simply ignored that and baselessly claimed that "PWAs 'just' didn't take off" with no effort to substantiate your claim whatsoever. So it's not me being "prejudiced", it's an objective prediction based on your behavior which you have just proven, my prediction was spot on.
"Nothing quantitative"? You either dont know what that word means or you're unable to grasp what you're reading. I've explained in great detail why PWAs couldn't live up to their potential. The reason why there is "so much analysis on Apple" is because they, as a dominant gatekeeper, have actively engaged in sabotage of PWAs in defense of their App Store by treating PWAs as an existential threat. (See? You're making me repeat myself again, because you either refuse to reflect on what you're actually reading or you are simply not able to connect the dots and realize that i've already answered your question)
>> That's just the lazy manufactured and false narrative that I've already thoroughly debunked. I'm not going to repeat it, since you would just ignore it again.
>This is how you replied to me. You say "ignore it again" but this is the first time we spoke and all I can see is up-thread. That's what I mean by prejudice.
I said that "you would ignore it again" (which you have just done btw) precisely because that's not the "first time we spoke", your comment was in response to my comment and that comment of mine already explained that Apple sabotaged PWAs. You simply ignored that and baselessly claimed that "PWAs 'just' didn't take off" with no effort to substantiate your claim whatsoever. So it's not me being "prejudiced", it's an objective prediction based on your behavior which you have just proven, my prediction was spot on.