> When an LLM generates code, you don’t want it to generate author names!
Who exactly is the "you" in that claim?
Justine clearly does want their author name (accurately) included.
I'd argue that anyone who's used a license with attribution requirements has explicitly stated they want that.
OpenAI et al. don't want that, for at least two reasons I can think of, 1) because their "artificial intelligence" isn't capable of doing it accurately or without "hallucinating" incorrect authorship attributions, and 2) because of the tsunami of copyright lawsuits that would immediately drown them.
Who exactly is the "you" in that claim?
Justine clearly does want their author name (accurately) included.
I'd argue that anyone who's used a license with attribution requirements has explicitly stated they want that.
OpenAI et al. don't want that, for at least two reasons I can think of, 1) because their "artificial intelligence" isn't capable of doing it accurately or without "hallucinating" incorrect authorship attributions, and 2) because of the tsunami of copyright lawsuits that would immediately drown them.