Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

A rare exception here:

> A Target spokesperson confirmed to Modern Retail that the company that runs the Bullseye Deals account does buy salvage merchandise from Target and sells it.

> Target doesn’t control this Bullseye Deals inventory, but it is aware that its reverse logistics partner is doing this.



So, it’s still no. They sell to a third-party company and forget about it.


What's the difference between selling exclusively to a third party (against whom they don't enforce their trademark) who buys exclusively from them, and actually answering the headline with "yes"?

I understand there's a legal distinction, but there's so little practical difference that you'd be hard pressed to explain the distinction to a layperson.

Unless maybe you got hurt by a defective item and tried to sue Target for damages. I assume this scheme is intended to insulate Target from that possibility, their lawyers would argue that you'd have to sue Bullseye Deals, LLC which has negligible assets, not their multi-billion-dollar corporation..


> What's the difference between selling exclusively to a third party (against whom they don't enforce their trademark) who buys exclusively from them, and actually answering the headline with "yes"?

The article doesn't make any claims about exclusivity for target selling or this company buying. I didn't spend a lot of time looking, but I don't think the trademark claim is very strong either. Target's logo is a red circle surrounded by a white/transparent circle, surrounded by another red circle (bullseye). Their trademark application says "The mark consists of concentric circles representing a target or bullseye design." This seller's logo is a silhouette of white bull in a red circle.

There's some similar elements, but I don't think there's confusion. Target is affiliated with bullseyes, and uses bullseye in some of its trademarks, but the word bullseye by itself is not a trademark of Target.


unless they are owned by the same parent, every possible difference is present. You seem to be assuming that target owns bullseye/liquidity services


How is this an exception? Bullseye Deals is an independent company, and there is a middleman (Liquidity Services, Inc) between them and Target.

From the article:

> Bullseye Deals technically falls into this latter category, though it is branded in a way that at least hints at it being associated with Target. Sources tell Modern Retail that all the listings are salvage merchandise from Target that’s been purchased by the reverse supply chain services company Liquidity Services, Inc.

> A Target spokesperson confirmed to Modern Retail that the company that runs the Bullseye Deals account does buy salvage merchandise from Target and sells it. Liquidity Services, Inc. did not respond to a request for comment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: