Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The M3 Pro and Max get virtually identical results in battery tests, e.g. https://www.tomsguide.com/news/macbook-pro-m3-and-m3-max-bat.... The Pro may be a perfectly fine machine, but Apple didn't remove cores to increase battery life; they did it to lower costs and upsell the Max.


It might be the case that the yield on the chips is low, so they decided to use “defective” chips in the M3 Pro, and the non-defective in the M3 Max.


In all M generations, the max and pro are effectively different layouts so can’t be put down to binning. Each generation did offer binned versions of the Pro and Max with fewer cores though.


These aren't binned chips... the use of efficiency cores does reduce transistor count considerably which could improve yields.

That said, while the transistor count of the M2 Pro -> M3 Pro did decrease, it went up quite a bit from the M2 -> M3.

It seems most likely Apple is just looking to differentiate the tiers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: