> This package requires quite a bit more attention and testing.
> It is not likely to behave as advertised in a large cross-section of browsers.
That doesn't sound like a cross-browser solution. In fact, it doesn't sound like a professional-level solution at all.
Perhaps one day it will be, but if you're arguing that using this kind of library is a best practice today and that developers should eschew jQuery in favour of such alternatives, then I don't think your position is credible at all.
> This package requires quite a bit more attention and testing.
> It is not likely to behave as advertised in a large cross-section of browsers.
That doesn't sound like a cross-browser solution. In fact, it doesn't sound like a professional-level solution at all.
Perhaps one day it will be, but if you're arguing that using this kind of library is a best practice today and that developers should eschew jQuery in favour of such alternatives, then I don't think your position is credible at all.