Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Man, every one of these comments has completely misunderstood the point. WebAuthn is an open standard. The provider is only there to sync your key. If you want, you can keep it yourself.

Why is everyone yelling about the sky falling down when this is the best thing to happen to authentication since ever?



If it syncs your keys, it has full access.

All I'm saying is that authentication is literally the keys to the castle, and inviting third party control of authentication has some scary implications in terms of privacy, monopoly control, and security.

We should at least be discussing this, but I don't really see that much discussion. People are just blindly adopting this stuff because it's convenient and not even thinking about what's under the hood or whether there is a way to back out or change provider.


> If it syncs your keys, it has full access.

It does, but it doesn't have to. You can use any provider you want, or self-host.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: