What I was thinking was that if the brute-force took 2 weeks (say) and the randomisation added just a single order of increase it could be sufficient to make the crack no longer worthwhile (eg passwords are changed monthly) - ie impossible in a timely manner which achieves the aims of the cracker.
It is not that it is impossible technically , it is that it is no longer possible to use the crack to good effect [ie "practically"].
Do you still disagree - I thought it was a truism that increasing attempts meant the crack could become impractical.