>"Life is always right;it's the architect that is wrong" -Le Corbusier

Well, he was 100% the opposite of that in pracrice. Forcing the architect's will.

That's the opposite of the point here.

> The very fact that his designs were so easily modified was, arguably, their strength.

Well, most weren't. They stand looking as bad/gloomy and unlivable decades after as they did their first day.

That doesn't detract anything from the observation, even if true.

That's fine, since my point wasn't that the idea is wrong, but that "he was 100% the opposite of that in practice".

And you should read @jules' full comment, because that sentence is mentioned at the end of the comment.