There’s no such thing and fortunately your vision is completely wrong.
There is no such a thing as a base or perfect model, nor goal to reach, by cheating or not.
People who are usually referred as bad at math just need another perspective. They might not understand the dominant perspective.
Compare eg. Groethendick or Lebesgue work with their contemporary fellas. And then ask yourself: why are some people more comfortable and fruitful with one perspective but not some other. Is there some constructions of some fields that will suit better one or another group of the population. Do our brains internal structure mature at the same age… etc.
There is no such a thing as a base or perfect model, nor goal to reach, by cheating or not.
People who are usually referred as bad at math just need another perspective. They might not understand the dominant perspective.
Compare eg. Groethendick or Lebesgue work with their contemporary fellas. And then ask yourself: why are some people more comfortable and fruitful with one perspective but not some other. Is there some constructions of some fields that will suit better one or another group of the population. Do our brains internal structure mature at the same age… etc.