> Literally questioning a climate study gets you castrated. When someone says “when you factor in this and this into the models it doesn’t match up with the conclusion” and suggest that data is cherry picked. Boom end of career. If I was a scientist I would be way too scared to go against the norm because it’s career ending. Climate science has no “real” science anymore.

Do you have any peer-reviewed papers I can read which break climate models with missing factors? I'm keen on reading and understanding them (as well as the outcomes for the authors)