Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think removing the self-managed data store feature makes sense even if not everyone likes it. It removes a source of architectural complexity, and most users aren't looking for local storage anyway.

Personally, the problem of managing reliable persistence of my password database just isn't something I want to spend time on, and the incremental difference in security posture is uninteresting to me given that it's encrypted at rest anyway. In terms of waking hours spent worrying about the security of my household IT, the security and persistence of sensitive documents (mainly vs. ransomware) is a bigger problem and I like that my passwords aren't tied up in that mess.



>I think removing feature X makes sense, even if people are using it. It just makes the developers job way easier.

And that's why I only use community maintained software with no telemetry or "data driven decisions."


psst i'm not paying for the software to make their lives easier. I'm paying for the software for the features.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: