Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I never got the system I and system II distinction. Sounds like a modern version of the bicameral mind. Is the System I/II notion falsifiable? The duality also reminds of the mind/matter boundary.

But what do I know? Kahneman got a Nobel for it and along with Tversky is considered one of the most brilliant psychologists of the 20th century.



So much has been built upon this framework in psychology and decision making that it’s probably work reading Thinking Fast and Slow. Not all of it has survived the replication crisis (in particular some of the experiments on priming) but much is still relevant.


my reading of it is that system 1 is instinctual and system 2 is intellectual, but of course the boundaries are blurry and arbitrarily defined.

> The duality also reminds of the mind/matter boundary

Nice, I'm a nondualist too. Yeah it's a strange delineation into "good" system 2 and "bad" system 1.

> Kahneman got a Nobel for it and along with Tversky is considered one of the most brilliant psychologists of the 20th century.

I don't think the Nobel committee have a monopoly on picking good or bad ideas ;)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: