I support Epic in this fight, but I agree with the Judge that "market" definitions in casual conversation have become so narrow as to be meaningless. I regularly see posters here unironically assert examples such as "general-knowledge search engine ads", "image-based social media", etc.
Anything can be a monopoly if you arbitrarily define its market as congruent with its market share.
Anything can be a monopoly if you arbitrarily define its market as congruent with its market share.