I am still a bit confused. Will this ID be different from the object id of for accessing the Durable Object, essentially in this case we would be using the Durable Object as a key-value storage? Or is it like the Namespace is separate from the Durable Object and each Namespace can have multiple objects of the same class under?
Edit: I think I get it now. Sorry I misunderstood that each Durable Object is like a singleton for the class you define. Its the other way around, you have the definition and namespace and then you can create a new object from those whenever you need it and this one would unique and accessible across all workers.
Edit: I think I get it now. Sorry I misunderstood that each Durable Object is like a singleton for the class you define. Its the other way around, you have the definition and namespace and then you can create a new object from those whenever you need it and this one would unique and accessible across all workers.