That will not help. I am talking about people who refused to draw even the most basic diagrams or perform high school algebra. Also, any result or experiment leading to their pet idea not working was immediately rejected. It's little more than "someone else needs to do the heavy lifting to prove me right." They aren't going to do anything more than restate their idea, again and again, and then be angry that nobody is rushing to have large universities working on prototypes.
John Baez has a lovely "Crackpot Index" that is an excellent jumping off point for a description of your average crank contact. It would be different for IRC but not dissimilar.
I know you're trying to give people the benefit of the doubt, but experience hasn't shown that it is worth it or even feasible.
As I said before, even the patent office has given up on perpetual motion machines.
John Baez has a lovely "Crackpot Index" that is an excellent jumping off point for a description of your average crank contact. It would be different for IRC but not dissimilar.
I know you're trying to give people the benefit of the doubt, but experience hasn't shown that it is worth it or even feasible.
As I said before, even the patent office has given up on perpetual motion machines.