I'm an anarcho-capitalist i.e. I've never seen proof for objective morality of any sort (including democracy) hence I support free markets to make the rules of society by group selection and feet voting.
Just as humanity doesn't need a forced state religion to be religious, humanity doesn't need a forced tax system to be social.
Please consider this view point. Don't confuse personal ethics and political morality.
Do you have any good (online) literature for your position? It seems to me that having money/bartering implies a government no matter how you slice it. I can see potential with some anarchical systems, just not primitivism or ancap.
From the Chicago School of Economics, there is David Friedman with "The machinery of freedom". [1]
A large part of the Austrian school of economics is also ancap. A great overview of the insights today can be found in "Libertarianism today" by Jacob Huebert. [2]
Sigh, I think it is a damn shame that you were put to -1 for attempting to clarify. I'm happy to get you to zero.
Personally, I prefer the term "Abolitionist" to "anarcho-capitalist." I'm an abolitionist because, just like the movement of old, I endorse the abolition of slavery. Governments consider people property (the US taxes worldwide income) and believes it owns the output of said property.
Thanks. Abolitionist is also a good word indeed. Another one might be political atheism.
The downvotes are OK though. People feel very strongly about certain ideas for society and mistake freedom for critique on the idea instead of just on the method (coercion).
For some reason parts of the world got over religious coercion. One day we'll hopefully have the same for ideological coercion.
Just as humanity doesn't need a forced state religion to be religious, humanity doesn't need a forced tax system to be social.
Please consider this view point. Don't confuse personal ethics and political morality.