Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> An employee with a "director" title posted and pinned a message saying the company is changing the CoC to require use of preferred pronouns and avoiding them is forbidden. I asked questions, most importantly: would it now be a violation of this new policy to write in the gender-neutral way that I already use? And how are you judging "avoiding", which requires knowledge of intent? Other people had questions and issues too. One moderator pointed out a problem with something I was proposing to do and I agreed after it was explained and said I wouldn't do that. The employee did not stay to field questions, but came back a couple hours later to tell me "we've been as clear as we can and your values are out of alignment".

In what world is this type of action supposed to be praised?



Which action? The directors or the moderators?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: