Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For airplanes flying at high altitudes with modern computers, random bit flips from comsmic radiation is actually a very real threat that has to be considered. IIRC there's about a factor of about 300x more radiation at 30000 ft and 900x at 60000 ft.

Core memory is a lot less sensitive to this than most memory types, so it makes some sense to store the most flight critical data in such a memory.



The sensible way to deal with bit flips is a gratuitous amount of ECC.


ECC doesn't help when you have an EMP caused by an atmospheric nuclear detonation. Those are the kinds of things the design has to consider.


But wouldn't that fuck up the processors as well as memory anyway?


Depends if the vacuum tubes are shielded. ;)


In flight reboot


Makes me why we don’t count NASA under DoD similar to DARPA to help with their funding.


The point of NASA was to create an agency for non-military aerospace development, while ARPA was supposed to handle military applications.

I think Eisenhower thought that this would insulate NASA from postwar budget cuts and make its funding more secure rather than less.

In retrospect, Eisenhower was a hell of an optimist.


In addition to NASA's explicitly non-military nature, we do actually maintain some relationship with our USAF counterparts. When it makes sense to do so, we're happy to work on mutually beneficial projects.


NASA exists to be the civilian side of the US’s aerospace ventures. The military side is the Air Force.


> NASA exists to be the civilian side of the US’s aerospace ventures. The military side is the Air Force.

Not the Space Force?

> https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/briannasacks/trump-spac...

;-)


or a lead liner? I know lead and aircraft don't mix, but a thin lead shield over just the computing boards shouldn't add too much weight, should it?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: