Not required, but achieving meaningful things is certainly easier after the type of growth that comes from overcoming challenges.

So you saw how they said 'we eventually turned things around' and then put the blame on themselves for bad branding.

I'm not sure if you know what 'cope' means. Or 'reading' for that matter.

It's rude to expect other people to be able guess what you want.

If you want something, ask me. I don't have crippling confidence issues so saying no is not a problem for me.

I can't wait until its more than just Elon doing it.

Replacing one monopoly with another is not the way to go.

Starlink is only a monopoly in locations without traditional broadband. It's not even a very good alternative in dense locations, where you compete with neighbors for bandwidth. Though perhaps they can serve enough users to influence prices a bit.

It's not replacing, it's adding a player, and diluting the monopoly.

You have been hearing predictions about what might happen to China in the future for 20 years, if the nation grows too quickly in the wrong ways and doesn't solve it's impending demographic problems.

The article is saying 'China peaked in 2021 and the past two years have been a zombie economy'. It's not talking about what might happen, but about what has already happened and why the state has been hyper-focusing on security and military competition with the west for the last couple of years.

Cold fusion, after containment with superconductors becomes easy.

Some people are visual learners. Some people are auditory learners.

No they aren’t; that’s been debunked: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Learning_styles&o...

If an advancement in plug capabilities is enough of a value-add for users, then the mobile will have both.

Could you share them?

Sure, for example, as way for a researcher to generate realistic GitHub profiles to combine with realistic resumes to do field research on labor market discrimination.

Example of such research, which is common, ethical, and completely legal to do:

https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/talent-acqu...

ethical use: you use it, and the squares on your github.com profile, which is a website that hosts git repos, turn green.

While I would be the first to say those squares are meaningless without context, if someone led others to believe they were the result of anything other than automatically generated posted and didn’t have a legitimate reason like the one I posted, that might potentially be fraud, especially if it was used as a basis for future economic exchanges, such as employment.

Isn’t my GitHub profile mine? Is it unethical to manipulate my own data?

People manipulate their identity all the time, flashy IG posts, financed fancy car, combing their hair, wearing makeup.

But code commit history is the line?

Thank you for making your framing clear with examples, and your POV with "code commit history is the line?"

Using GitHub green squares as a basis for offering employment is as stupid as using the color of their hair. Don't play stupid games if you don't want stupid prizes.