Europeana is an EU initiative to bring together digital collections of museums, archives, etc from around the EU and make them accessible, findable etc. While they try to encourage everyone to use CC it depends on the organisation that is putting the stuff online, their own rights to it (eg art is often loaned) and how it's put online (commercial photographer or similar might offer to put them for free online in order to be able to sell reuse licenses). So it's a mixed back but last time i checked most seemed to be free to use and share.

If i can suggest a reframing:

Do you really want to spend your most productive, healthy and free/uncommitted years working too much just to have more time when your body is starting to weaken and many of your dreams start to become impossible?

Do you want to spend less time with your children for the chance to have more time for your grandchildren?

Just that they have a name that will immediately be without any trust at any non -tech company. Basically mentioning "hacking" will make any non-technical CEO shiver and call the lawyers.

It is unlikely that there is a company in the US that has a security team that hasn't heard of H1. They're kind of a big deal. Since they're the ones handling the first contact in these situations, you can safely let their name be their problem; they know how to explain themselves.

The more realistic concern here is that for these kinds of findings --- CSRFs in random web applications --- there simply isn't going to be a contact at the target company, and H1 isn't going to find one for you. That's why they point out they can't promise a contact.

>It is unlikely that there is a company in the US that has a security team that hasn't heard of H1.

You'd be surprised. HackerOne is relatively new, just several years old. Does everyone know OWASP, almost certainly yes. Does everyone know the BSide community? No.

Anyway, H1 can act as a shield, in this case. On the other hand, companies like WhiteHat or Rapid7 are probably more well-known since they will probably spam your security team on a regular basis trying to sell their products.

Disagree. Any big company can be sufficiently ignorant, but Hackerone and Marten Mickos both have a brand name associated with them, partially due to their funding: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/hackerone#/entity

I think the disclosure assistance is a pretty clever idea for generating new sales leads, since by definition they will be talking to companies with an actual zero day situation.

OK, let the lawyers handle it. You don't make progress by catering to other people's ignorance and insecurities.

You are right, that isn't how you make progress: it's how you make money.

The name is not ideal. I've heard a story of it also not being great for employees when talking to custom officers :/

But any person looking at their homepage would be a lot less concerned. Impressive logo's and a clear story for an enterprise audience.

What nonsense. It's out of patent. There's no cost anymore except production and distribution. It's not a matter of recovering costs anymore, it's an oligopoly fixing the prices.

What stops you from trying?

Just tell them. Most of them would be proud and happy to show you what good veg* cuisine looks like but they are worried to be judged and are feeling horribly guilty about the (largely false) sense that they constantly inconvenience others so want to do anything to avoid disappointing :-)

Vegetarian for 12+ years. I happily eat quorn or other good veggie substitutes as long as they are healthy (ish) and taste good. Being vegetarian doesnt mean i have to give up on the good elements of the food industry/convenience. I'd probably also eat lab grown meat but I'm not sure as i didn't have a chance to try yet.

For me it's an ethical argument to be vegetarian, i still love the taste and smell of meat (but contrary to the cliché repeated in this thread have never lapsed) - why give up on it completely if i can get something similar that allows me to still enjoy a bbq or spaghetti Bolognese. Most veggie substitutes taste like crap though - but that's a matter of trial and error (my advice is to avoid any veggiemeat that's egg based, they all taste disgusting and probably come out of the horribly cruel egg mass production.)

I'd be vegan but with small kids, a non-veg partner and an area that's not very veggie friendly that will have to wait a bit longer.

I'm wondering how good/bad the combination is (think"hot yoga"), or if too much stress on cells/heart is simply too much.

It's a good question. I've seen some studies that show better recovery from exercise if it is followed by a steam or sauna. I don't think we know enough to determine what the dose-response curve looks like.

Related: the science is far from complete on cold exposure, but cryotherapy (cold air or ice baths) seems to enhance recovery for endurance training, but it strangely reduces progress in strength training, at least if it is done immediately following exercise. There is speculation that cold exposure reduces the post-exercise inflammation response enough to limit the body's repair response. This might not be the case if you do cold exposure outside of the post-exercise window (but this hasn't been studied afaik). Once again all credit to Rhonda Patrick who covers this in one of her videos on cryotherapy.

Not sure you read the article, the last paragraph makes clear that they hope this will help people that are unable to exercise. I guess they are thinking of the elderly or similar.

Of course people will interpret it as they wish but this is interesting research, not "vaccines-cause-x" type of research. For those looking for excuses I'm sure they can find plenty of others already.

Very interesting. Did these ideas bear fruit?

I diverted my attention to lower hanging fruit in my Ph.D., so stopped following that literature closely. Overall I think that unless you already exercise regularly, exercising will have a larger effect on cognitive ability than any task-based cognitive training regimen.