This page is just a container for a google doc in an iframe. Interesting CMS strategy.

It seems to work reasonably transparently most of the time. I was in one of the author's classes in ~2010 and I think the class schedule was put online in the same way.

He should set overflow: hidden on the body

I have been doing a minute by minute podcast analysis of The Big Lebowski since last year and some of our episodes are almost two hours. http://gutterballs.tv

I'm doing the same movie frame-by-frame:

http://jacksongariety.com/journals/the-big-lebowski-project

:)

By "frame-by-frame", do you mean "shot-by-shot"?

How is frame any less correct?

In film, a 'frame' is a single photographic exposure. A movie typically consists of 24 or 30 frames per second.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_frame

By contrast, a "shot" is "a series of frames, that runs for an uninterrupted period of time."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shot_(filmmaking)

Personally I took the phrase 'frame-by-frame' to be a figure of speech.

"A figure of speech is the use of a word or a phrase, which ascend from its literal interpretation."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_speech

I think the comment author was just trying to emphasize they were trying to be thorough, a bit like when police say they will search an area with a fine-toothed comb. No reasonable person expects the police to use actual combs.

Frame is a technical term that has a precise meaning in this context.

Dude! You need to do all the frames. That would be truly epic.

This may be the best resume I have ever seen, too. She would be on the top of my list without a doubt.

The color coded tree is animated and reconfigures itself as you hover over the various items in the legend. We are seeing a static screenshot. There is also a text version available which we are not seeing.

She does hit the spot between developer and designer. That statement seems to be confusing a lot of people. I am not confused by that. Those are exactly the type of people I need. I guess it is just not in everyone's argot.

Maybe there are some nits to be picked, but just the fact that she broke new ground in this manner says a lot to me, and it is all positive.

This is just true of me. Maybe it is not right for everyone. I thought the HN crowd would dig this a lot more. My mind is a little blown by all the nitpicking and bashing. Maybe there is a little bit of pissing contest going on here.

The more cognitive energy students spend on figuring out how to use systems stops them from focusing the course content. The bigger barrier to participation the less participation there will be. Course management systems like blackboard, desire2learn, etc are rarely if evaluated on user-centered principals of design and usability. Decisions are made based on business factors like cost, licensing, etc. Features are only evaluated in an abstract sense. I guess it is this way with many large organizations.