My understanding is Congress critters are immune from insider trading laws and their offices don't have to follow minimum wage laws. Hard to see such a law from actually affecting them.
All of the major freeway expansions I have experienced required at least two years to complete. During these periods, lanes in the construction zone were heavily constricted, resulting in all of the roads surrounding the expansion project being completely filled with stop-and-go traffic during peak hours until the projects were completed, which seems to suggest the number of lanes makes some kind of a difference in something, somehow.
The authors seem to suggest that demand for roads is infinite, as expanding roads merely increases the number of trips people choose to make, thus infinite expansion will result in infinite trips.
These analyses always appear to me as if they are without any understanding of how humans actually behave, resulting in nonsensical nonsense "laws".
> The authors seem to suggest that demand for roads is infinite, as expanding roads merely increases the number of trips people choose to make, thus infinite expansion will result in infinite trips.
Agree. They literally claim this with “increasing lane kilometers by 1% will increase VKT by 1.03%” but subtly acknowledge that this fundamentally doesn’t make sense with the hand-wavey “any feasible increase in roadways will have no impact on congestion”. Keyword feasible.
The real law doesn’t seem to be that congestion rises to meet capacity but that no one will ever fund enough road expansion to make peak congestion low.
So, if instead of installing a bunch of apps, setting up search filters, and refreshing browser tabs on my phone ever 15-30 minutes, then the instant something meets my parameters I immediately leave work and, if possible, make a deposit on a new place, I open an app and find 5000 places meeting my requirements, meet them when I'm not working and on my time, and tell them I like a different one better so I'll hold off before making a decision, makes no difference on the price?
The author should check to see if the HTTP response body contains "nginx" or "apache" and just filter those out. Seems like at least 50% of what I'm seeing.
Also would be nice if there was a hotlink to view the original site directly from the index page.
The search page lets you add multiple exclude filters to the aggregation pipeline. So as you filter common strings, the interesting results bubble to the top.
If you click the image it should take you to an info page on the service.
"AI" is readily abundant all over the place, yet has no profit. I no longer believe the observably false claims that profit is somehow causal to availability.
Probably as long as the mail server responds with not delivered. Really, it would be better to have a lawyer go through the decision than laypeople parsing a judge.
reply