this isn't a "solution" in the sense of solving a problem that people use to build upon or share to help others not deal with that problem, rather its an essential part of the educational process of a course to derive the answers yourself to actually learn the material
By her tweets I saw two orientations, anti white, female superiority. You can research and find them, in the world of tech, if I see someone with a lot of bias I tend to doubt of his/her quality as a journalist.
I'd say that hold regardless of which specific bias of those categories they may hold, because that degree of blatant bias in any area shows they are willing to distort the truth to fit their worldview lens, an unacceptable practice for a journalist.
Yes, bias is not good for journalism, but also someone judging people by skin color or gender and not by merits should be excluded from communities that are meritocratic based, otherwise they will destroy us.
Funny that I got downvoted for saying that, I will say it again, it was not legal, and therefore because the lack of participation is not representing the opinion of the Catalans.
Obviously there is no legitimacy on declaring the independence in an unilateral way considering that the referendum was illegal. What is happening is pure "picaresca española" ;)
In my opinion the referendum was not lawful because:
1- Was not legal, so the participation was low.
2- There were serious irregularities in the voting system.
I'm against the violence and I think that the independence of a region is something morally right, but I don't consider that the referendum 1-O legitimizes that the Govern of Catalunya declares the independence of Catalunya in an unilateral manner. I think the Catalan Govern is cheating in its own benefit.
Yeah, probably we will see progressively cases of people having anxiety and panics attacks because VR experiences, of course also the opposite, the "this is not my kind of game" will become a more serious statement.
No i think automation is good. But the distribution of the profits from automation is completely a mess.
The population needs money that they can spend for the companies to make profit. So either a taxation like this or a universal income, else the flow of money (and goods and services) is stalled.
If you think the automation is good, I guess one of the reasons is because it improves efficiency, then why to incentive a company to hire more humans?
Should a company be also subsidized by the government if it's reducing work accidents and reduces energy consumption(when introducing automation)? That subsidies would need to be payed by taxes from companies and citizens.
In my opinion the solution should not be to employ humans when a machine can do the job more efficiently, and introducing a new tax it could counter incentivize a company to introduce automation and that's exactly the opposite of whats desired. Since to introduce a new technology requires an investment and therefore risks for the company owners.
I think that once it is reached a point that it generates net unemployment, something that has not been the case for previous industrial revolutions, people should be able to reach products and production capacity at lower costs, so to be able to make a living being employed less hours.
These profits you talk about are not from automation but from product or service. You could tax companies specializing in automation, but how do you define who to tax? If software an automation based product?
Taxation won't work, for many reasons. Universal income/welfare system has it's own share of problems, but so far that's the only solution that could be somehow made workable.
I don't find many articles talking about how AI integration in the industry could lower the production costs in many markets, that would allow consumers to be able to buy products cheaper, so they could work less to be able to pay basic stuff.
Also it would allow people to be more capable to scale multiple tasks, for instance: instead of being a taxi driver you become the manager of a driver less taxi.
