Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kevinwang's commentslogin

From the link alone, it looks like the state actively funds cloud seeding research, not active practical cloud seeding?


Applied research is active cloud seeding


Thanks. Link should be changed to this.

Edit: oh wait, this article isn't the source either. It references an article by "The Information", which I assume is https://www.theinformation.com/articles/salesforce-executive... There's also this follow-up: https://www.theinformation.com/articles/story-salesforces-de...

It's paywalled, so I can't verify.


Dec 21 article https://archive.is/oi302 and the Dec 23 follow-up https://archive.is/7RXKb


The YXY problem?


Not to be confused with the ABA problem*


Or famous Swedish band ABBA


It says:

We see potential uses in companionship and affective interaction. The robot’s ability to elicit spontaneous touching and positive emotional responses suggests it could serve in therapeutic settings or as a social presence for people who spend time alone. The quiet operation and gentle movement make it suitable for environments where noise and sudden motions would be disruptive.


Well said. I feel similarly despite being born about 15 years later.


Good idea! Anyone should be able to add it if it's in the public domain.


A little sad for me because I've enjoyed the global leaderboard aspect for years but of course my second reaction has to be to take a step back and appreciate all the joy that this one man has given us for all these years.

And he's made it clear from that start that he never intended the global leaderboard to be the point, plus AI the last few years messes it all up. All good things come to an end, and I gotta appreciate the good run that we had, and the voluntary work of one person that gifted it to us.


Based on time-zone, it wasn't really global.


Not sure if you meant this because it doesn't cite the paper you mention, but it's a similar work: "An Investigation of Model-Free Planning", Guez et Al. (Deepmind) 2019 https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.03559


Speaking of not citing, that one could go a bit further back.

https://cdn.aaai.org/AAAI/1987/AAAI87-048.pdf


For problems that human teams eventually get correct, they seem to have submitted mostly 1 time -- occasionally 2 or 3. For problems that they did not get correct, there are some problems with up to 16 submissions.


Ah, I see I was in fact reading it wrong. So 9 is definitely an unusual but not unprecedented number of submissions.


Darn, I can't hear the music on iphone safari :(


If you try turning your phone off silent it should work!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: