Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | johneth's commentslogin

> Anyway, there is no sense to listen to Trump. TACO is a thing.

It's never a good idea to disregard something just because you want it to be true.

Trump's done a lot of shit that he said he'd do (tariffs, capturing foreign leaders, wars of choice). He's incredibly stupid. You can't predict stupid people.


I cannot predict his moves, I can not do anything to affect him. There is no point to listen him.

The only thing I can do is to donate money to buy kamikaze drones for Ukraine to help defeat his dear friend vladimir.


You can stockpile food, resources for yourself, your family, and your neighbors.

Thank you.

It's easy to cancel a direct debit / standing order from internet banking.

> Providing Internet to the entire world that's faster than fiber.

Bullshit. You're not going to be faster than fiber from orbit, with congested bandwidth.

> Providing space launch capability that's 1/10th what NASA charges.

NASA isn't in the commercial launch space.

> Providing quite good AI at 100 tokens/sec.

It's the weakest of the slop machines.


I would assume most sites that block access to your AI assistant do so because they want to show a human ads, i.e. not run at a loss. Seems reasonable.

> This is ultimately just going to give them training material for how to avoid this crap.

> The arms race just took another step, and if you're spending money creating or hosting this kind of content, it's not going to make up for the money you're losing by your other content getting scraped.

So we should all just do nothing and accept the inevitable?


> So we should all just do nothing and accept the inevitable?

I daresay rate-limiting will result in better outcomes than well-poisoning with hidden links that are against the policies of search engines.

Lots of potential for collateral damage, including your own websites' reputations and search visibility, with the well-poisoning approach.


The README.md specifically states how to allow for nice robots to proceed unhindered. The people behind these efforts, I would imagine, don't particularly care about their sites' reputations in the cases people use LLMs for search.

To be honest who cares about Google search anymore it's pretty useless these days.

The small non-profit I volunteer with finds Google ads to be surprisingly effective, and much more cost-effective than FB for what they do, so there's at least some Google search usage in the demographic that they serve.

> this seems anachronistic, written for a human artisan laboring over each naming choice directly

Some of us want to write well thought-through code, rather than letting an AI just spew poorly thought-through unmaintainable shit.


Re: the design of the site. Please use higher contrast colours, especially the barely visible grey text on black background. It's annoying to try to read.


I think the county list is set in stone because Royal Mail refuses to update them (for some idiotic reason they still control the postcode database, which I guess lots of websites use and therefore use the old county names / boundaries). For example, it's still Humberside, even though that hasn't existed for decades.


Yep, I recall that Royal Mail is one of the websites that has the "Avon" issue. I don't know why they don't just update it to make it accurate as they update their PAF files for postcode lookups every three months with new postcodes. "Avon" is strange as it's still used in some contexts, such as the police force is known as Avon & Somerset


RFC 1738 was superseded by RFC 3986 (URIs) 19 years ago, and the URL Living Standard.


> RFC 1738 was superseded by RFC 3986 (URIs) ...

RFC 3986 has the same wording (appendex C), <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986#appendix-C>.


> Revolut works similarly. You don’t pay any fees on transfers to other Revolut accounts, but you do for other bank accounts.

Does it? I'd be surprised if it does in the UK at least, as all banks do free transfers to every other bank in the UK via Faster Payments. I thought it was the same in the EU?


Agreed. In the UK, I've never been charged a fee to send money within the UK on Revolut.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: