If by invisible you mean "things randomly won't work and you'll smash your head in the wall trying to figure out why".

Did you consider that your talking about GROUPS of people where _some_ individuals from ALL groups regularly behave poorly and deserve criticism and action?

Or is that too much of a nuance against tribal thinking?

Why do you think I'm not aware of this? Did I not just explain how different people who do the activity have different perspectives, priorities and proclivities? Did I not just explain how I disagree with the way some cyclists conduct themselves, while plainly being aware that not all cyclists are like this?

Maybe none of this way apparent to you, despite it being plainly written out in simple English, because... I don't know actually. Can you explain your failure to read?

And yet you immediately started with an anti-cyclist whine while ignoring pretty much everyone else.

These debates are so stupidly tiresome.

You have brain worms, I started by explaining that I am a cyclist. Obviously not all cyclists are particular ones I disagree with.

It's a bit relevant to the conversation when the person making it has an incentive to deflect blame from their own corrupted country to evil EU.

That's an interesting mindset, since those 30+ tech savvy millennials are the ones that actually still have some money to spend left on apps and similar crap.

What does your comment add to discussion instead of a pointless whine?

There's a small law called GDPR which makes this kind of pulls very illegal. Even for Schufa which doesn't forward your direct data.

They really aren't.

Many US states are richer than Switzerland, what's their excuse?

They did. This is why Graphene works.

They said they have GOS support in the roadmap, meaning they know it doesn't work but pinky promise to work on it in some undisclosed future.

Call me confused. The comment I was responding to is saying something different:

> The initial limitation to Google/Android is not great, we know that, and we have support for other OSs on our list (like, e.g., GrapheneOS).

Yes, they still need to audit and whitelist the builds of GrapheneOS. That's what "standard APIs" are - they identify a build of OS, but someone still needs to make sure it's secure.

If you don't want Google to do that for you, then the app developer has to.