Just remember science is about what and how, when you get to stuff like why, it's philosophy. 90% of all of the ridiculous arguments that seem to happen around this subject appear due to the inability to keep these separate.
>It is probably the largest thing that is holding me to my faith in an a God.
How does the existence of a God explain the absence of nothingness? Infinite regression, and all of that. That is one of the things that would keep me away from a faith.
As someone who believes in both an intelligent designer creating the world, and micro (but not macro) evolution, I am extremely interested in reading this.
"I'm sure if AirBnB was first posted here they'd get back 50 reasons why it can't work"
Absolutely this. It's a great site and a great idea. There are hundreds of reasons NOT to do something, but that doesn't always mean you shouldn't try.
You want to use the OpenPGP specification, the most popular implementation of which is GPG. But if you want to use the actual PGP software, that is perfectly fine, too.
The point is to make encrypted/signed messages the norm rather than an outstanding event causing suspicion.
"... because there are so many kinds of cars you can buy that cars are about choice."
The "Choice" part of Linux doesn't come into play so much when you are "shopping for a distro", it's the fact that if there is something you don't like the spoiler on your distro, you can switch to another. Heck, you can even build the distro from the ground up and choose EVERYTHING in it.
This isn't the full constitution, only the bill of rights.
I've also seen a couple U.S. constitution projects on github that either have the actual (whole) constitution, or offer up a way to "modify" it through github to develop a "better" constitution.
I grew up in a small farming community in Indiana and from 8th grade on I worked summers and after school on a Dairy farm.
I think I got paid $9/hour or something like that, but I worked so many hours that I had a decent amount saved up after a while.
The work was really hard, and that's what made me decide to go to college for Computer Science. I respect people who can do that work their whole life, but it is rough.
In this picture they have someone underneath the 'invisibility blanket' which they claim bends light around the person being concealed. How would the invisibility shield know what is beneath the person if the person is laying on the ground?
Although I would assume the range of cover of the cloak would have to be much larger than shown in the image and it is hit-or-miss in Photoshop when using that feature.
Plus, why would the cloak, if it works as described, cast a shadow?
Edit: Ah, I see now. On the actual site they admit mockups. But why not make the mockups more accurate by reducing the shadow in Photoshop as they claim the cloak only casts 5% of the resulting shadow. But if it casts even that little of a shadow would the cloak not show that on the visible side? Wouldn't the cloak stand out by being slightly darker than the surrounding area?
Well it's obviously a mock up but let's say there's actually a layer under the person as well. So let's say light activates the material on one side which is connected by a smartfiber to an opposite point on the bottom. The color of the surroundings on the bottom are then sent back to the first point via the smartfiber which then emits the color.
An incredibly miniaturized version of the famous Mercedes commercial:
Whether or not evolution is true, it explains _how_ our world was created, but not why.