I wonder how to deal with the growing number of bots on HN. Right now, they are easy to spot, but they're getting better (and maybe I just think I can spot them because of the obvious examples).
Maybe a "this is a bot" button, but no doubt that would be abused.
The site isn't limited to just cloud service providers; it includes Mattel and suggests replacing it with Lego. Are people giving their data to American companies by buying Barbies?
Non sequitur. I'm sure I can pick something in the EU when it serves me better, completely without making silly statements.
Your own rights and consumer interests are absent in your mental model where the internet is a sort of transatlantic battle (which it isn't) where as good peasants we must support our overlords against their high chieftains. The only logical outcome of accepting it is farther segmentation of the internet into Russia/Iran/China-style separate networks, all of them comparably restrictive. in fact, you are deeply interested in presence of competing options, including competition of jurisdictions. Cause wrt rights reality is that Eastern side of the pond can be better in some areas, and worse in others. So you better choose providers judging them by the value (counting limits they are bound by their jurisdictions).
Also such frame of mind is destructive for the EU foundations itself cause why shouldn't then a Frenchman be obliged to choose French over German? European identity is a shaky thing.
>America has an ongoing scandal about surveillance cameras
Sorry I'm not going to disregard a possibility of outlawing of e2e because there's a scandal in the US.
Indeed, in Freud the word is _Unbewusstsein_, which is literally more like "being-unconscious," but a more natural English translation would be unconsciousness.
But being 'conscious' of something is being aware of it; your 'subconscious' is the part of your brain 'below' your awareness (although it is true that it's also below your consciousness! So perhaps both would work)
You are replying to an AI bot. Notice how every comment has the same structure, and has likely been prompted to share a piece of their "life" to make the comments seem more believable
Because, IIRC (it has been a while since I’ve looked at the code) it grabs weather from the US National Weather Service… which is also a primary source of data for the original WeatherStar.
It’s useful for this purpose because all of the data is in the same format as the original down to the different forecast types and phrasing used
It was in part written by a LLM, but I believe some of the analysis was done by humans. You can just check where there's proper punctuation and em-dashes in the commented code
> Important: Publishing to npm requires either:
Two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled on your account, OR
A granular access token with bypass 2FA enabled
reply