Very unreasonable to use the amount purchased last year as the only amount they could ever get in a fiscal year

I rewrote the article, it's even better now:

The tomahawk entered service in 1983, in 2026 they only produced 57. DO THE MATH!

This means the military can only have (2025-1983) * 57 = 2394 Tomahawks.

But the military says they have approximately 3000-4000 tomahawks in inventory. Is it a conspiracy? How could they POSSIBLY have more than 2394 if they can ONLY MAKE 57 PER YEAR?!

prompt: rite me article about US only can make 57 tomohok missels a year but looks lik they have moar than that

That's not defense procurement, that's defense de-procurement

> "Actually, I made a mistake. I meant Cursor."

Someone who can't describe the model they're using after asking 3 times across several months, probably isn't the 10x engineer you think they are.

There's no such thing as being too rigorous when you're talking about proofs in math. It either proves it or it doesn't. You get as rigorous as you need to

PLLLLLLEEEAAAASSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

It just doesn't make any sense. Starts off the user experience with a kick in the nuts and a slap across the face. "You don't own this machine"

it would be easier to use claude to write a cronjob that does the same thing for you but accurately

And yet it probably covers 90% of what people use OpenClaw for.

I want to like swift so bad

Apple bothers me less than Microsoft. At least Apple has been consistent. "Our hardware, our software"... while Microsoft plays all these games. At the end of the day, there's never been a solution for people who care about this stuff other than Linux.

Linux is a pretty good choice these days, and requires you to sacrifice nothing in terms of functionality :)

Lol what does ICE have to do with a local police officer being able to bully a tech worker into providing your private communications?

what example are you talking about? assuming it's non-UK would like to read about it.

at what point can we consider the development of "set this element's text/html" to be done?

When browsers implement a variant that lets you separate data and code perhaps. That's what I expected when reading the headline: setHtml(code, data, data, ...), just like parameterised SQL works: prepare("select rowid from %s where time < %n", tablename, mynumber)

This new method they've cooked up would be called eval(code,options) if html was anything other than a markup language

tablenames cannot be parameterized in SQL

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78516750/parametrize-tab...

the first time I wrote a custom HTML element was the last time I ever reached for a React framework