Probably pretty big difference in system prompt from using the apps vs hitting the api, not that that’s necessarily what’s happening here. + I think openclaw supports other models / its open source and it would be pretty easy to fork and add a new model provider.
Why wouldn't the system prompt be controlled on the server side of the API? I agree with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47010577 ; I think results like this more likely come from "roleplaying" (lightweight jailbreaking).
The websites and apps probably have a system prompt that tells them to be more cautious with stuff like this, so that AIs look more credible to the general public. APIs might not.
Weirdly I agree. After seeing the truly god-awful pay to win gambling-filled landscape of Roblox, Fortnite feels pretty tame and respectful. V bucks aren't shoved down your throat, the battle passes are pretty transparent about what you get, and the whole cosmetics store feels less lootbox-heavy than a lot of games.
> Now, third-party games can offer premium in-game items and effects, with developers pocketing 37% of the proceeds — temporarily doubled to 74% for 12 months.
37%? Developers get a 37% cut? Holy fucking hypocrisy from Tim Sweeney and the camp at Epic Games with their predation here.
After seeing "Do things that don't scale" trending the other day, I thought it would be fun to have a hackernews archive of all the Paul Graham essays.
This was vibe coded pretty quickly so can't vouch for its integrity, if anyone has modifications they want to make here's the repo: https://github.com/basketbla/pg-scraper
Also please let me know if something like this already exists! There was a reddit thread where somebody posted this:
One of my first posts on HN! It's a writeup about building a bolt.new clone inside of bolt.new and then building another bolt.new clone inside of the bolt.new clone.
