This makes a lot of sense. We've seen how quickly and randomly Claude Code can sour on you (if it's even up). Nobody who uses this for work wants to be reliant on that.
And many of those tool providers could see for 10-20 years now that if they didn't provide a web based version sometime soon, they would go out of business sooner or later.
There are almost no applications that a government employee should be running natively on their machine anyway.
A bigger blocker I see in Belgium is all the corporate and government software written in Java or .NET-with-Angular and that has to be deployed via Azure because… compliance.
Yes, slower start, more memory/cpu use, likely worse UI as the transition broke desktop conventions and/or just lost some power features in the process
Eh. I suppose to each their own, but my experience as a user and developer is… that it depends on a lot of factors.
Many web apps open faster than many apps I have installed. Some of these apps have a faster mobile web app version.
And then, of course, there’s Apple’s increasingly bad choices in interaction and interface design. Some web apps are superior because they stick to simpler or more appealing design.
Linear comes to mind, their iOS app post-Liquid Glass is unappealing. Their macOS version is effectively a web app, and a very good one at that. Things is native and wonderful. Apple’s own apps can be both slow and ugly (hi App Store!).
The main reason I use Aerospace (after a thorough testing of most macOS third party window managers) is for the space management and instant space switching.
Just keep doing stuff and gaining experience. Sometimes you'll find that you don't know how to do something, at that point don't just reach for an LLM, do your best to try and understand it, google around, and if all else fails, put it down and maybe come back to it later with fresh eyes
(Or too many people going back to Twitter.)
reply