Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Thesaurus's commentslogin

Sick irony dude, mad original.


Why are people allowed to post links to computerworld on here? The site is right behind buzzfeed in zero content click bait "list-articles". I really hope the admins start moderating bottom feeding "news" websites from HN.


It's the same reason Google employees can vote each other up to support and defend Google. It's all self-serving.


This is blatant SJW psyops that has nothing to do with the nature of this website.


How are your precious bodily fluids doing.


Oh it is, is it? What does that make you? An insensitive nobody?


There's a thing called PRISM in case OP forgot. Get this click-bait off of here.


Pottering needs to toughen up if he wants to dictate the majority of userland. His attachment to Google+ is a bit annoying from a FOSS perspective too.


"Torvalds needs to tone down if he wants to dictate the majority of kernel space" isn't much of an argument, is it? I don't see how your comment regarding Pottering is any stronger.

Our attachment to Hacker News is also a bit annoying from a FOSS perspective, unless there's been some release since the suggestion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5006037 . Torvalds uses Google+. How is your comment any different from the pot calling the kettle black?


Torvalds needs to tone down nothing. The Kernel would be utter shit if he wasn't cracking the whip on people. I personally find his language on LKML hysterical and enlightening; he writes well too. I appreciate when people are honest and don't sugar coat things.

I wasn't aware Torvalds uses G+, shame on him for doing so. The comment was more about the absurd policies the user signs off on to use the service more than the lack of source code, not that that isn't an issue.

HN being closed source is a bummer. I respect a webmasters choice to refrain from publishing server side code. But considering most of the content discussed on HN, it is hypocritical. As unethical as HN is from a FOSS standpoint, I can't turn away from a site where the user-base falls on the right side of a bell curve for I.Q. Too good to pass up.


>Disclosure was on the 24th, today is the 29th. The patch had to be developed in-between

Apple didn't make the patch they just repackaged it. That's five days to write a dozen lines of script to update the shell. Every single GNU/Linux distro was patched the day of, get real.

>I felt it was 50/50 that they'd update it vs. remove/disable it.

Remove it for what ash/sh? Tim Cook doesn't know a megabit from a megabyte, let alone a shell. That pencil pusher doesn't care about his users, only the money. This was only patched for PR. Still no sight of it on the automatic updates list.


I just patched my CentOS 6 server a few hours ago. Double check yum.


I patched mine about 10 hours ago. Is this one newer?


Make sure you have bash-4.1.2-15.el6_5.2 instead of bash-4.1.2-15.el6_5.1 which was the initial patch.


Yup.


Very thankful this made it out today.


Agreed, kudos to everyone for the speedy response!


I can't believe I read that whole thing, it was written so well. Quite informative and very interesting.


Is there another website other than wired with this article?


As mentioned elsewhere on this page: https://www.eff.org/cases/rubin-v-new-jersey-tidbit


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: