Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Griffinsauce's commentslogin

Joke's on you, we implement all animations in JS

This could also apply to the recent wave of hate towards Next.

Next is the Microsoft Sharepoint of the JavaScript world. It’s a terrible solution to just about anything, and yet gets crammed into places and forced on people due to marketing-led decision making.

My 10 minute Next build was replaced with a 1 minute 30 second Vite build.

And such an extrodinary different is usually holding the tool wrong, but Next has years old open issues for many of the causes here (like forced output tracing) and has just ignored them. Possibly because the Next team's preferred deployment environment isn't affected?


4 minutes?! How large is that app?

Not meant as a gotcha but I'm surprised because people always tout it as being so much faster than Next. (4m with Turbo would have to be a crazy huge app IME)


most likely they are not running the prod build on latest mac. so it is slower.

Yeah, 4 mins is currently the avg. build time for our TanStack app dockerized. The turbo part takes 30 sec with Vite 7

An example that is hard to follow defeats the point. It's just showing what pattern is possible and you can imagine the abstraction layers and indirection that would make it happen accidentally.

In the words of the comment: the rough edges are what make you.. you!

Keep polishing and everything eventually turns into a smooth shiny ball. We need texture, roughness, edges.


Is there a name for this phenomenon? I've taken to calling it "the nihilist's excuse"


I call it race to the moral bottom.

Related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNqozQ8uaV8


I love it when I can guess what a video is before I click it. Exactly what I hoped it would be.


Similar to false dichotomy. "If we won't do it, <other evil guy> will".



I think it’s called being a “shithead”


Aside from that unlikely read, this deal was still used as a pressure point on Anthropic, there's absolutely no way OpenAI was not used as a stick to hit with during negotiations.

What is your red line?


This stood out to me as well. The level of discourse is incredibly low compared to other topics. Huge amount of "next/vercel sucks" without any constructive or deeper argument made.

There is a similar vibe on the Next.js subreddit, just enormous amounts of shallow negativity. Very strange.

(I'm not saying there aren't valid reasons to dislike the framework or company but the way it's expressed is consistently incredibly juvenile for some reason)


Eh, it's been rehashed over and over again. People experienced with Next.js and other frameworks don't need to read the same constructive, deeper arguments being made ad infinitum. It's like when people say microslop or micro$oft, everyone knows what they're talking about.


I've been pushing our apps at work in this direction and it's definitely worth it.

If you're relying on webpack plugins heavily, I'd consider that a liability either way. It's going to seriously hamper your portability to other frameworks and build tools and even new versions of the current ones.

You can easily run turbopack for development / preview environments and webpack for production(-like) ones btw. as long as you don't rely on custom magic.


It's extremely obvious that "main" is more ergonomic. It's sad that we're so resistant to change (regardless of how valid you think the initial trigger was)


The miniscule (and still arguable, not obvious) "ergonomics" improvement was not and will never be worth the pain.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: