And not saying anything interesting, in any case. It's easy to say "cut more, tax less." Zero effort. Let's see some thought behind it -- what are we going to cut, and why? What are we going to fund, and why?
I feel like a lot of people don't really understand where the money 1) comes from, and 2) gets spent. Balancing the USG budget is a very, very big task.
He’s a self appointed representative of the majority. I guess he doesn’t care about democracy at all and probably views empathy as a defect or something…
Doesn't seem right as plenty of institutionals get cooked.
He claims loyalty with long-term holders who trust him (read:less nagging and more license). I suspect it's also more convenient for his IR team to avoid worthless meetings with super shareholders.
Interestingly I found the long s annoying and I had to think every time I saw it, but I quickly got used to and could read it naturally after a few paragraphs.
I tested this, and if I have slide-to-type disabled, and slide my fingers, then every letter I slide over will highlight, but only the letter I let my finger up on will show up in the text input box.
If I don't have slide-to-type enabled, then only the letter I press down on will highlight, and what shows up in the text input box is pretty inconsistent for horizontally adjacent letters.
> I'm having a hard time articulating this but AI-generated code feels like progress and efficiency, while AI-generated articles and posts feel low-effort and make the dead internet theory harder to dismiss.
I think it's the size of the audience that the AI-generated content is for, is what makes the difference. AI code is generally for a small team (often one person), and AI prose for one person (email) or a team (internal doc) is often fine as it's hopefully intentional and tailored. But what's even the point for AI content (prose or code) for a wide audience? If you can just give me the prompt and I can generate it myself, there's no value there.
reply