This kind of services that requires the user to share a seed/code to the recipient always seems kinda awkward to me. The code is not simple/short enough to be verbally communicated; If I can send the code, I usually can just send the file.

Not necessarily. For example I might have a few gigs of photos to send someone, and I want to send them uncompressed. I could text someone the seed or QR code for them to download the photos, but I can't send those photos (especially uncompressed, even if over RCS or WhatsApp) over text.

Wouldn’t this use your internet data, though? Isn’t the point of these tools to send locally without being limited by internet speeds and without having to use your mobile data?

No, Iroh works over LAN as well.

The code can be easily communicated as a QR code. But a 100 MB file cannot.

This does kind of smell like the wrong way to use it. Not trying to self-promote here, but the experiences you shared really made me think I headed the right direction with my prompting framework ("projex" - I once made a post about it).

I straight up skip all the memory thing provided by harnesses or plugins. Most of my thread is just plan, execute, close - Each naturally produce a file - either a plan to execute, a execution log, a post-work walkthrough, and is also useful as memory and future reference.

They would be 100% lying if they have infinite budget allocated to this campaign and haven't approved all requests.

That's... not what was written there. Better read gp again slower.

In my prompting framework I have a workflow that the agent would scan all the artifacts in my closed/ folder and create a yyyymmdd-archive artifact which records all artifact name and their summaries, then just delete them. Since the framework is deeply integrated with git, the artifact can be digged up from git history via the recorded names.

Isn't that for... readability...?

Somehow made me think I should enforce a rule agents should sign their conment so it's identifiable at first glance

Quite curious about this. Does the agent gets its own repo and deliver with commits?

No. Not yet, anyways. I maintain autonomy over source control at the moment. Headless activity is verified in a separate unity editor instance before I push any commits. I might look into source control tools once I get through perspective and orthographic screenshot tools. Giving the agent a way to see the final composed scene seems much more valuable than SCM automation right now.

This is a bit concerning. Did you skip everything besides "yogurt delivery", or you don't agree someone talking to you regularly is counter-loneliness?

Do (your country) people know Japanese?

I'm not sure what this question was meant to convey.

There are many countries (or cities) in the world where you can easily get by in English beacuse almost everyone you need to / want to interact with can speak English. Amsterdam, Paris, Berlin, Stockholm are 4 the come to mind even though their native languages are Dutch, French, German, Swedish.

Japan is not one of those countries. Yes, you can survive without speaking Japanese with a lot of effort and asking friends to translate.

So it's not an unreasonable question to ask if they speak English. It's effectively asking, are they liked the 4 cities mentioned above.

I was once at a bar in Tokyo and where I met a young French woman who was thrilled to be going back to France after 6 months in Japan. She had wrongly assumed the her English would get her by like it had in many other countries who's first language was not English.

> Amsterdam, Paris, Berlin, Stockholm are 4 the come to mind even though their native languages are Dutch, French, German, Swedish.

Berlin is very much an exception to basically everything in Germany. Concerning Paris: many French people speak bad English.

The question labeling a whole ethnic can't understand English rubbed me the wrong way, that's about it. This is a much better comment for understanding your rationale.